Why do people do the things they do? In real life it's sometimes impossible to
unravel the reason some people do the things they do, but in novels the
motivation is essential to the story. It's not good enough to have the hero do
good things just because he's the designated "good guy" nor for the
villain to do bad things because that's what bad guys do. The motivation for an
action needs to be comparable in strength to the act committed.
To be believable, writers need to be students of human
nature. They do this by being people
watchers, reading news stories, and researching cause and effect through text
books, listening to knowledgeable people in various professional capacities,
and through drawing on personal experience.
As a journalist, I learned to question Who, What, When, Where, and
Why, then found these Ws carry over into the fiction field. It's the Why I'm concerned with today. This past year I've undergone four major
surgeries; the last just four weeks ago was the scariest and has left me with
the most severe life altering after affects.
During my recoveries, along with a lot of physical therapy to learn to
walk again and to adjust to becoming a total diabetic, I've done a lot of
reading, including a number of books in genres I don't usually read. Along with nearly a hundred books read, most
of which I enjoyed, there were some that held little interest for me, three I
couldn't force myself to finish, and several that left me wondering what was
the motivation behind the actions taken by various characters. There was even one that changed a character's
motivation from financial greed to obsession.
Actually motivation can change, be enlarged, new factors brought in, but
the change needs to be built into the story and made plausible to the reader.
William Faulkner was a master at clarifying motivation. Even his bit part villains rated a back story
(not an info dump), leaving the reader with a clear picture of what made that
character tick. Faulkner never wrote a dystopian novel, yet strangely two
dystopian novels I recently read, A
Nothing Named Silas by Steve Westover and The Witnesses by Stephanie Black, reminded me of why I enjoy
Faulkner. They both skillfully shared why their characters were in the
predicaments they were in, why they
continued to fight against the impossible, and why their adversaries were also
motivated.
Sometimes people do unexpected awful things seemingly out of
nowhere, but a deeper analysis nearly always shows the factors that motivated
the action. It's usually easier to
understand the protagonist's motivation, but author's often skimp on the other
side of the coin. Envy, greed, hate, revenge, sense of inferiority, laziness,
political zeal, religious fervor, lies, coverup, jealousy, control, and the
list goes on and on for negative behavior.
Behind each word is an experience or philosophy that drives the villain
and though these motivations are not usually the primary focus of the novel,
they clarify the protagonist's dilemma and are important to the story. It's not enough to know what the hero has at
stake, when understanding what the villain has at stake clearly ratchets up the
suspense and provides a more balanced story.
If the motivation is insufficient or weak the story loses credibility.
Those of us who are news junkies and have a preference for
printed news find ourselves frustrated with electronic news sources that don't
answer all of the Ws. We become even more
frustrated with novels that fail to convey why
the story matters, why the antagonist does what he does, and why the protagonist cares enough to
fight back or escape. Without motivation
behind action, there is no story.